Psychology in Film

Back to the directoryFind in the timeline

Theatrical poster for Ikiru
Image rights: Copyrighted promotional artwork. Image source

Ikiru

A public servant facing a fatal illness reconsiders his remaining time. Kurosawa’s drama uses that situation to open questions about purpose, responsibility and the choices that make a life feel meaningful.

1952. Feature film · 143 min. Chronology period: 1950–1969.

Feature filmRelease or archive checkedEmotionIdentity

Directed or created by
Akira Kurosawa
Country and language
Japan
Content notes
Illness and death as described in the inspected synopsis

Why this work matters for psychology

How might awareness of mortality reshape what a person values? The film invites interpretation of meaning, regret, and late change without offering clinical guidance.

Psychological connections

Screen stories illustrate how psychological processes look and feel in narrative form; they are not empirical proof or clinical case studies.

  • Mortality and meaning

    How could awareness of limited time change the priorities a story gives its central character? Use the illness premise as an interpretive question, without generalizing about how patients experience emotion.

    Topic: Emotion, grief and stress regulationBasis: Grounded in the inspected Janus synopsis; framed as interpretation, not proof.

  • Late reconsideration

    What would make a change in direction meaningful to the character? Discuss how viewers judge a life’s priorities, rather than treating a fictional story as a finding about identity.

    Topic: Self, identity and dissociationBasis: Grounded in the inspected synopsis; open question rather than finding.

Portrayal and accuracy limitations

  • The inspected source is a distributor synopsis describing a fictional portrayal of illness; it is not a medical account and should not be used to generalize about people with cancer or about coping.

Questions to watch for

  1. 1. What might prompt a person to seek meaning late in life, as the synopsis frames it?
  2. 2. How does a story's two-part structure invite viewers to reconsider earlier events?

In the Psy101 course

Use the linked textbook concepts as questions for interpreting the premise, rather than as evidence validating its portrayal.

Textbook links show where these concepts sit in an introductory course; they do not study this screen work. See the full topics and course map.

Companion readings and work source

Readings labeled as conceptual companions or contextual references study the psychological topic rather than this screen work.

  1. [1]
    Films, J. (n.d.-b). Janus films ;  ikiru. https://www.janusfilms.com/films/1056Checked 2026-10-23.Release or archive checkedSelected official synopsis and catalog details inspected; full work not viewed.
  2. [2]
    Spielman, R. M., Jenkins, W. J., & Lovett, M. D. (2020). Psychology 2e. OpenStax. https://openstax.org/books/psychology-2e/pages/9-1-what-is-lifespan-development(OpenStax course textbook · Selected passages checked · Checked 2026-10-23).Conceptual Companion (Does Not Study This Work)Conceptual companion: does not study this work. It investigates the underlying psychological construct or textbook topic.Conceptual background on lifespan development; does not study the film.Note: Selected textbook material inspected at the stated access scope. Conceptual companion; it does not study or validate this screen work.
  3. [3]
    Spielman, R. M., Jenkins, W. J., & Lovett, M. D. (2020). Psychology 2e. OpenStax. https://openstax.org/books/psychology-2e/pages/10-1-motivation(OpenStax course textbook · Selected passages checked · Checked 2026-10-23).Conceptual Companion (Does Not Study This Work)Conceptual companion: does not study this work. It investigates the underlying psychological construct or textbook topic.Conceptual background on motivation; does not study the film.Note: Selected textbook material inspected at the stated access scope. Conceptual companion; it does not study or validate this screen work.